This workshop was offered at the 2019 National Science Foundation, Advanced Technical Education Principle Investigators Conference in Washington, D.C.

Citation:

Calhoun, C.D., Greenidge, G., Carnes, C. (2019, October) Broadening Participation: How Gender and Race Theory Inform our Work. Workshop presented at National Science Foundation Advanced Technical Education Principle Investigators Conference in Washington, D.C.

Summary:

The theory of planned behavior implies that ability plus interest equals intention and ultimately planned behavior. As we attempt to attract more women and people of color into STEM fields, we often find that these assumptions don’t hold true. What interrupts a learner’s intentions? In this workshop, we will discuss relevant race and gender theories to see how they can inform our work as we develop programs to engage underrepresented students.

References:

  • Ajzen, I. (1991), “The theory of planned behavior”, Organizational behavior and human decision processes, Vol. 50 No. 2, pp. 179-211.
  • Berndt, T. J. & Heller, K. A. (1986), “Gender stereotypes and social inferences: A developmental study”, Journal of personality and social psychology, Vol. 50 No. 5, pp. 889.
  • Calás, M. B. & Smircich, L. (2009), “Feminist perspectives on gender in organizational research: What is and is yet to be”, The Sage handbook of organizational research methods, Vol.  No., pp. 246-269.
  • Cejka, M. A. & Eagly, A. H. (1999), “Gender-stereotypic images of occupations correspond to the sex segregation of employment”, Personality and social psychology bulletin, Vol. 25 No. 4, pp. 413-423.
  • Cheryan, S., Plaut, V. C., Davies, P. G. & Steele, C. M. (2009), “Ambient belonging: How stereotypical cues impact gender participation in computer science”, Journal of personality and social psychology, Vol. 97 No. 6, pp. 1045-1060.
  • Eagly, A. H. (2013), Sex differences in social behavior: A social-role interpretation, Psychology Press.
  • Fink, S. & Haisley, E. (2015), Shattering stereotypes: Women in entrepreneurship, London, England: Centre for Entrepreneurs, Barclays.
  • Jost, J. T. & Banaji, M. R. (1994), “The role of stereotyping in system‐justification and the production of false consciousness”, British journal of social psychology, Vol. 33 No. 1, pp. 1-27.
  • Gompers, P. A. & Wang, S. Q. (2017), Diversity in innovation: Working paper 17-067, Boston, MA: Harvard Business School. 
  • Hoffman, C. & Hurst, N. (1990), “Gender stereotypes: Perception or rationalization?”, Journal of personality and social psychology, Vol. 58 No. 2, pp. 197.
  • NCWIT. Intersectionality in Tech 101.
  • Santos, F. J., Roomi, M. A. & Liñán, F. (2016), “About gender differences and the social environment in the development of entrepreneurial intentions”, Journal of Small Business Management, Vol. 54 No. 1, pp. 49-66.
  • Steele, C. M. (2011), Whistling Vivaldi: How stereotypes affect us and what we can do (issues of our time), WW Norton & Company.